On Wednesday my students are going to be learning about meeting reader expectations--structuring their papers so that one thing logically leads to the next, so as to not confuse readers. Editorgirl, who, as per Lunkwill's advice, I love unconditionally and not because of her wonderfulness, and whose name I simply cannot uncapitalize at the beginning of a sentence, passed on a wonderful idea that she used when teaching a similar concept to her English 115 students. The idea is that you do something completely random--she played a movie clip, I believe--and then go on with your lesson without explaining. You finish your lesson, say goodbye, and let your students wonder for two days if you are insane or if you were just trying to kill time. Then, the next class period, you ask them why they think you did that random thing. They talk about it, express confusion, and that's when you reveal that you were making a point: if you throw something in your paper without explaining it or tying it into something, you're confusing your reader.
So today I stopped in the middle of my lesson, played "The Last Trumpet" by Lyrics Born and Lateef the Truthspeaker, then continued with the lesson. While the song played I stapled some papers to hand back. I couldn't look at the students' faces. I fought the urge to giggle, could hardly hold the stapler still. Here's the problem: I am a being of order. Logic holds my world together. Random acts of insanity simply are not me. And now I suspect my students think I'm weird. Weirder even than they usually think I am. And it drives me crazy to let them go on thinking that until Wednesday. And what about the students who don't come on Wednesday? They will go to their graves thinking that I'm some disordered guy who randomly plays new age political rap songs in the middle of class for no good reason. They will point at me on Judgment Day and hold me responsible for their lives spiraling into chaos.
And I will point to editorgirl.
Who will bow.
ReplyDeleteI'm imagining the whole thing and I'm loving it. Pity I couldn't be a fly on the wall watching their faces.
And I will now refer you to my blog so that you can see who the more insane English instructor is. Once I write the post. (Give me a minute.)
Oh, and I (1) love you unconditionally too, and (2) also cap "editorgirl" at the beginning of a sentence. Unless I'm rebelling.
You mean I can't cap editorgirl? Do you understand the chaos this introduces to my world? Do you?
ReplyDeleteAnd I'm not allowed to e-mail you until I post, but does that prohibit me from blog commenting? I don't think it should. However, I think you should be prohibited from reading my blog comment as it's delivered to your e-mail box. You should have to come here to read it.
.
ReplyDeleteThe fish who isn't the man who wasn't there still isn't and, in fact, won't be till next Tuesday when the little grass skirts will fall along with most misconceptions and UN policy.
czwofob
If my life is chaotic, I'm going to blame Editorgirl and not the fact that I'm easy.
ReplyDeleteAs per your instructions, Edgy, I have not read your comment.
ReplyDeleteTh.--You confuse me.
I like it. I wish I could make my sister take your class.
ReplyDeleteeditorgirl's a genious and it was wise of you to follow her lead. (I'm rebelling.)
ReplyDelete.
ReplyDeleteI like to see
Elephants pee
But no one cares
That no one shares
Such photographs with me
If their lives spiral out of control, it is no one's fault but their own. They are (for the most part) adults and adults have no one to blame for their screwed up lives than themselves. Whatever happened to agency?
ReplyDelete